Big Brother

I had a department meeting today. My supervisor told everyone about some changes. The one change that had everyone in an uproar was this log that we have to complete whenever we leave our buildings. At first, everyone was okay with it. We all thought it was wise to keep track of when we are at meetings in other buildings, doing outside evaluations or attending to personal business for a long period of time. But then we found out that we have to log in and out if we leave our buildings for lunch. What?? People were outraged. Why is the district keeping tabs on our whereabouts at all times? I knew the answer. The support staff at the high school have been abusing their lunch breaks. The high school is large and no one keeps track of the staff and their attendance during the day. They don't have to sign out of their building, so they come and go as they please. When I worked as an intern, I witnessed people coming in hours after school had started, leaving for hours at a time to do personal business during the day, and just being away without anyone knowing where they were or when they were returning. I'm sure there were some crises that happened at the high school and there were support staff that were unaccounted for. My supervisor said that he created the log so that when he gets phone calls about his staff, he knows where they are. So basically, because a few people abused the freedom to leave the building, everyone has to suffer. Isn't that the moral of education reform? Because of some bad practices in the past, the remedy goes completely overboard and inconveniences everyone.

BBC

RTI: An Update

My district decided to roll out RTI at all elementary schools this year for grades K-2. It decided to do this by having a 2 hours inservice with every k-2 teacher, elementary special education teacher elementary school psychologist, social worker and speech pathologist. It was a packed room with a bunch of confused people. There was too much information and not enough explanation on why RTI is a different concept. That's my main gripe: So far, only special ed people have been talking about RTI. Regular ed teachers haven't been talking about it. So when they sat in the inservice, most of them had no idea what the presenters were talking about. Each school should have had its own day to discuss this. The teachers need a new frame of reference. Many times I heard teachers still using terms as "referral" and "pre-referral" and they just didn't get it.

Unfortunately, my principal is to blame for the teachers from my school misunderstanding RTI. She erroneously told them that RTI was just like our broken pre-referral system. Therefore, the teachers didn't bother to pay attention. She is in denial, and we need her to get a grip and realize that this is a paradigm shift. The old way is dead. RTI is now.

The literacy specialists are inviting a teacher from a school that ran a pilot RTI program. We hope to learn how they adjusted and what role each person played. That's the main concern from the support staff: How do we fit into RTI? If our principal isn't taking the lead, then we need to be proactive and figure out how we fit before someone tries to use us as before.

BBC

Whose Child Is This?

Second day of school. Everyone is still learning the ropes. Kids are still learning the rules. Teachers are still learning who the students are, which is critical for what happened today.

Mid-morning an older woman comes into school looking for her granddaughter. Apparently her grandson put the granddaughter on the wrong bus. The little girl was supposed to go to another school in our town, but she got on the bus that came to my school. When the grandmother asked us, it seemed odd because we figured that it could not have happened because the teachers take attendance and someone would have noticed an extra student. The little girl was a kindergartner so my principal and the grandmother walked to the kindergarten wing. They asked the teachers and no one had heard of the girl. Luckily the student teacher was listening and told the principal that a student with the same name told her that she was in first grade, so she walked her down to the first grade wing. So principal and grandmother walked down to first grade and there was the little girl, walking beside the teacher, learning the rules of the classroom. When she saw her grandmother, she ran to her and hugged her. The teacher was bewildered and didn't understand what was happening. Apparently, when the little girl said her name, the teacher misheard her and thought she said a name that was similar sounding. The teacher thought she was a student that was not present on the first day of school. Being in first grade, the teacher did not have a true idea what the girl looked like, and assumed she was the missing student. The funny thing is, the little girl is actually in kindergarten but decided to tell the student teacher that she was in first grade. In the end, the grandmother was happy that her granddaughter was safe and sound, and took her to the correct school. It was truly an odd story that had a happy ending.

BBC

First Day

Another first day has come and gone. I asked my principal how first days affected her. She told me that she has nightmares about them. I haven't gotten to that point. My role on the first day is to be supportive, and since the first day is all about learning the rules and routines, I'm not needed as much. I spent the majority of my day working on scheduling meetings and tracking down information on new special ed students. Eleven new special ed students and I only have information on half of them. My school has so many new students, yet so many have left. There is a constant struggle with residency issues, and we suspect that there are still a few families that try to break the rules and send their children to school. The first few days are spent waiting for students to enroll because of late vacations, not being aware of when school started, or pending residency confirmations.

The day was uneventful, but my principal did pose an interesting question. As I passed by her office, she called me into her office. She asked, "What do you call those small bags that marijuana is sold in? (pause) Dime bags." She answered her own question. The odd thing was that she was busy typing something as she asked me the question. Now I'm wondering who she was typing this for. I simply remarked, "I'm not going to ask," and walked off.

BBC

RTI: The Experiment

"It's just like stuff we've already been doing." That's what my principal said in response to teachers asking "what's RTI?", when she informed them that there was a professional development day that would focus on it. Yeah, this year is going to be great. (sarcasm alert) When she said that I looked across the room to a couple of special ed. teachers and chuckled. This is going to be a mess. Where to begin? First, there is nothing happening in my school that is related to RTI. For some reason my principal thinks that it's better to introduce it as something that has been done before, but it's not. This is a huge shift from everything we've been doing. Our pre-referral process is a nightmare, and it needed something major to fix it. This is a start if it's implemented well. Second, the fact that teachers haven't heard of RTI is a major concern, but it has always been my concern. This is supposed to be a regular ed initiative, but regular ed people haven't been talking about it. This should be interesting.

BBC

Corporal Punishment

There are 20 states that still allow corporal punishment in schools. Click the link for the New York Times article http://bit.ly/NAKlJ I grew up in one of those states, and luckily live in a state that doesn't allow this practice. One would think that special ed students would be exempt from this form of punishment, but that would make too much sense. I hoped in 2009 that most states had moved away from this and it would be an interesting, antiquated story from my childhood. Unfortunately, more people will be able to share stories of paddlings for years to come.

BBC

Jury Duty

I was summoned for jury duty and I had heard that most lawyers don't like having psychologists as jurors. I'm not sure how true that is, but I was wondering if anyone else has heard this? Is it true?

The process is excruciating. I had to report by 8 AM but then we didn't get started until 10 AM. There was a humorous orientation by an assistant clerk. He must have done the speech hundreds of times, so he must have to spice it up a bit so that he doesn't fall asleep. Everyone definitely listened because his voice was very entertaining. Think game show prize announcer, e.g. Jack Pardo.

I couldn't help but think about how I was going to get out of jury duty. It's sad that I am a sensible and knowledgeable person, perfect for a jury, yet I don't want to be inconvenienced. So many people feel this way. If most people hate the idea of jury duty and do what they can to get out of it, then most juries are comprised of disgruntled people that couldn't get out of it and those who have nothing better to do. This may explain some of the unbelievable acquittals that have occurred in the past, i.e. O.J., Robert Blake, etc. The assistant clerk brought up civic duty and involvement in government. He brought up the issues and protests in Iran and I felt guilty for about a minute, and then I remembered that I enjoy having the summer off.

In the end I was not selected. They found enough jurors for the trial. Summer's back on.

BBC

The End is Near

Just a few more days and it will all be over. I actually made it through all of my annual reviews unscathed. I have a few more items of paperwork to complete, but I'm closing in on the end. Unfortunately, if it's the end of school that means the children are losing it. They are falling apart in record fashion. The kids with behavior issues are coming apart at the seams, and some of the well-behaving kids are having issues. It happens every year, but it always surprises me. There's something about the prospect of spending summer at home that causes turmoil within some kids. They can't handle the lack of structure for the entire summer. I feel for them. The ones that come from terrible homes get it the worst, because school is an escape. So for the next few days I expect to get a lot of requests for help.

BBC

Merit Pay for Teachers

This columnist makes a good point: merit pay can be disastrous in the wrong school. I think that mine fits that bill. http://bit.ly/16pECq

I see my staff becoming insanely jealous of any teacher that would earn the bonus. I can see some cheating happening, and worse, I think referrals would increase. Not only would we see an increase in teachers focusing their instruction solely on standardized tests, but more teachers would try (in vain) to have kids identified so they wouldn't be in their classes anymore. I'm not sure how that would work towards their yearly progress numbers. Furthermore, how would I become eligible for some merit pay? I'm pretty good at what I do, don't I deserve a bonus. Yeah, I don't see this working too well.

BBC

ED not only means Erectile Dysfunction

Recently I was part of my first evaluation for a student with Emotional Disturbance. As I told the parent that her son qualified for services under Emotional Disturbance, the words sounded really awful coming out of my mouth. The mental health field has made tremendous strides by changing mental retardation into intellectual disability. Why hasn't there been a similar change in Emotional Disturbance? The term sounds very negative and contributes to the stigma of being in special education. Hearing that a student is ED conjures up images of the worst kind of student in the classroom. No one hears ED and has pleasant thoughts.

The student was the subject of my last post, "Stuck in a Corner." He's definitely ED, no question. His inability to regulate his emotions prevent him from meeting success in the classroom. In the PPT I described him as having 3 sides, 1 side is jovial and compliant, 1 side requires constant prodding to motivate him to perform, and 1 side is completely non-compliant. I have seen these different sides of him during the evaluation and observations. Now that he has been identified I hope that his new program for next year will help him find success.

BBC

Stuck in a Corner

It always happens this way: I plan out my day, know where I need to be each minute of the day, and the unforeseen happens. I was observing a child in p.e. when he decided to have a meltdown. He was participating in a shooting contest where the students had to make the most baskets in 30 seconds. He missed a few shots at the beginning, but started to make them before the time was up. He became upset because he thought that one of the student's that was supposed to retrieve the balls for him impeded his performance. Luckily I was there to witness the whole thing and felt that he was being unrealistic about what actually happened. He stormed off the court and went through the emergency exit into the stairwell. I followed him and tried to coax him out of his funk and back into the classroom, to no avail.

We sat in the hallway for over 30 minutes as he repeatedly said "no" to every request I made. I ended up recruiting the principal to sit with him because I was supposed to finish an evaluation. I wasn't in the mood to sit with him, especially when he was being so non-responsive. He was stuck and I was stuck. Of course, I was the reason he stayed there, so once I left, he was willing to leave with the principal. I try not to take it personally when that happens, but it still gets to me. Sometimes I feel absolutely helpless when a kid refuses to leave the classroom, hallway, gym, etc. There really is nothing I can do when a student doesn't want to leave. I can't physically force the student to move. I have to somehow convince them to do so, but it is impossible if the child has a) emotional difficulties, b) a language impairment or c) general behavior issues or d) problems with authority. That accounts for about 80% of my school, so when a kid doesn't want to be removed, they put up resistance and we have a standoff. I guess the one thing I have going for me is that I never let the child see me annoyed by the situation. I try to stay pretty calm no matter what. I just wish that I could get some negotiation training from the FBI or something. I need to know some tricks on getting kids to give in and do what I need them to do. That might be beneficial in the long run.

BBC

Genius

David Brooks' op-ed piece in the NY Times was interesting. Click here http://tinyurl.com/coepo4
I remember reading about Tiger Woods' work ethic and how he would practice religiously. He practiced so much that other competitors failed in comparison. I don't think it's a coincidence that he's selling Tiger Focus Gatorade: Hydration for Concentration. He knows what it's all about.

BBC

Snitching Ain't Easy

I have a new student that I'm counseling this spring. Our focus in on his anger management skills. He doesn't have any. When he reaches his boiling point, he becomes belligerent with adults, and has a huge persecution complex. Earlier this week, he had an incident involving two girls in his class. According to him, these girls are targeting him and threatening to hit him. One of the girls hit him with a stick at recess. My student became upset of course, but did not tell any of the recess aides. He went on to class and later another girl pushed him into her friend's desk, causing my student to take out the desk and causing a huge commotion. My student had enough and went to approach her when his teacher recognized what was going on and stepped between them. My student was sent to the office to cool off.

When I saw him he told me what happened. He even told me about getting hit with the stick earlier. I asked him why he didn't report any of this to an adult, and he said that nothing ever happens. The kid is actually quite bright because we discussed the reasons for the girls to keep bothering him. He said that they know he would get into major trouble for hitting a girl. So he knew how the consequences would be worse for him. He felt that he couldn't tell any of the recess aides what happened because they wouldn't do anything. He also that the girl would probably call him a snitch for telling.

This just about made my blood boil. The whole snitching thing bothers me because kids get confused and actually endanger themselves because they don't want to be seen as snitches. It doesn't make sense. I hate how the word has changed in meaning. It used to mean someone who was also a criminal reporting someone else's crime for a reduced punishment. Since when did it mean a victim that reports a crime committed against him or her?

I feel like lecturing everyone in my building about what it means to be a snitch. Endangering yourself in the hopes of not being a snitch is idiotic, and I want to work on changing the understanding of the word. Somehow the misunderstood meaning has become the de facto definition and it has remarkably impacted how kids deal with bullying and violence in school. My hope is that I can change that somehow.

BBC

When Education and Politics Collide

I attended a town council meeting to discuss the proposed budget cuts to education. As a result of the mayor's budget, the school system would have to lay off 27 teachers, cut sports, gifted, and arts programs, and possibly eliminate a school. The meeting was a parade of the town's brightest students pleading with the council to save the gifted program. After about 8 or 9 students spoke about what TAG meant to them, the artsy students spoke about their programs. Some high schoolers spoke about their sports teams. Then some teachers spoke and they were followed finally by parents. The meeting got contentious when the fire marshall declared that there were too many people in the building, and asked those who had spoken to leave. Some obliged. I was only there for about an hour, but it was interesting to see the various factions lobby for their interests. Few people spoke about the possible changes that would affect a large number of students. Closing a school or eliminating a classroom in each school would have a profound effect on classroom sizes, but for the first hour that wasn't mentioned. The town council will make a decision by June. That gives plenty of time for more drama and sudden twists to this saga. The fate of education for the foreseeable future in this town is in their hands.

BBC

Seniority

This should have posted on 3/27/09 - (sorry)

Yesterday we had parent-teacher conferences, where parents come in to discuss their children's report cards. This meant that the students only had a half-day of school. Technically, staff had the rest of the afternoon off and we had to report back to school by 5:45 for the conference, but I stuck around a little bit late and tried to finish some work. I headed home, walked and fed the dog, relaxed and then headed back to school at around a quarter after 4. I arrived, checked my mailbox and ran into my principal. She told me that she needed to talk to me, so I followed her to her office. Usually when she says that she needs to speak with me, it's usually about a student and she wants me to follow up on an issue. So it came as a shock that the subject of our conversation would be me.

We sat down and she told me that she had just returned from an administrators' meeting with the superintendent. The topic was the education budget that the board of ed submitted to the mayor. The mayor has cut almost $1.7 million from the education budget. The superintendent basically told everyone to prepare for the worst. In order to adjust for the deficit, she would consider everything from closing schools, redistricting, or eliminating classes. It would be brutal if it went through. In preparation for the worst, the superintendent announced 27 people would be laid off. This number included one new teacher in each school, and one new person in each department. My principal told me this and then asked me the question that gave me a chill, "Are you the last person hired in your department?"

At first I had to think about it. I breathed a sigh of relief when I remembered that a colleague left her position last year and someone was fired a few months after I was hired. My feeling of comfort was short-lived when my principal outlined how some people would get lay-off notices and mentioned that anyone on leave would be guaranteed their position. Well, what did that mean? I knew that there was one school psychologist out for an extended leave, so then, would they eliminate 2 positions? Then I started to worry again. We have someone out for an extended leave, so if she returns, does that mean I need to start looking for another job?

I went home and tried not to think about it but it was hard. I ended up trying to keep my mind occupied, but it didn't work. I kept vacillating between "I'm going to be laid off" and "It won't be me on the list." My principal had a meeting the next day, where the list of faculty was released to the administrators. When she arrived at school she broke the news to me-I was not on the list.

That day I learned a valuable lesson: always know your seniority. My principal showed me a list (where was I supposed to know where to find it) of every employee in the district by order of seniority. I was third from the bottom, so I think I'll be safe for a while. In the end, someone from my department decided to retire at the end of the year, so in a way everyone was spared.

BBC

State Assessment Season

It's state assessment time in my district. Children around the state are taking the the state's proficiency test for the entire month of March. I don't think that Lent and the state test occurring in the same month is a mere coincidence. Everyone is on edge and the kids are reaching their breaking points. Not to mention that Daylight Savings Time hasn't helped at all, either. I proctor the tests for three English Language Learner (ELL) students, and I have seen the pitfalls of testing this population firsthand. Since my students are ELL, they could have all parts of the math test read to them. So I was able to sit down and read aloud the directions, sentences and word problems in the math test. It is supposed to be the way to determine if a child has true math skills, by removing the language component. It does require the student to be able to understand English when it is spoken to them, which is a big assumption. While I was able to read to them for the math test, I wasn't able to read more than the test directions for the reading and writing tests. It has to be really frustrating for a student to sit there and struggle through a test that's not in your native language, a language that you've been exposed to for only a year or two. In fact, I know it's frustrating because I had a student have a complete meltdown in my room. He was inconsolable and I didn't know how to make him feel better. I wasn't sure what I could say that would make him feel better, or could comprehend. I felt trapped because he wouldn't leave my office and I had to dismiss the other students and take his test back to the secure location.

My other gripe is that the test is designed to fool students into thinking that they are doing well. The math test is especially guilty of this. It's a multiple-choice test, and without a doubt, each question has one answer choice that is possible by trying to solve the problem in a simplistic yet incorrect way. It drove me crazy because as I read the questions to my students I watched them use horrible tactics to solve them. I wanted to yell at them, but of course I had to keep everything to myself. I'm starting to think that we may need to go the Princeton Review route and talk about answers that are there to trip you. I would settle for kids trying to solve a problem, and if they do it incorrectly there answer isn't a choice. I remember that happening a few times on the SAT and GRE.

BBC

IQ and Older Fathers

Today's New York Times had an article about the IQs of children of older fathers. Older fathers have children with lower IQs when tested in different cognitive areas, including fluid reasoning, memory, and motor skills. When I see studies like that I often wonder who did the testing and what test did they use. According to the news article, the information was gathered from 50,000 mothers who attended 12 clinics from the years 1959 to 1965. Whatever test was used, it must have been the earliest edition. Interestingly, an older father's detriment to IQ seems to be biological, while an older mother's asset to IQ seems to be environmental. Older mothers are more nurturing and have the economic means to provide more enrichment. The article mentioned the age range of the the fathers and mothers in the story. They had participants as young as 12 and 14! A teenage birth in the 60's had to be controversial.

BBC

School Psychologists and Pop Culture

I don't have HBO, I can't afford it. So there are many shows that have entered the pop culture Zeitgeist that I never got to experience the first time around: The Sopranos, Sex and the City, Six Feet Under, The Wire, etc. Nonetheless, I just started watching The Sopranos on DVD. Season 1, Episode 7 titled "Down Under"featured a school psychologist. Anthony Jr. stole communion wine and showed up at school drunk. He was suspended from school and the principal decided that he should be evaluated by the school psychologist for ADD. The first thing I noticed was that this Catholic school had its own school psychologist. Impressive, but likely, I don't know. There were a lot of things in the episode that wouldn't be legal now. I'm not sure if it's a reflection of the time since it was 10 years ago (1999), a depiction of special education identification in private/parochial schools, or poetic license. First, the principal and the school psychologist strong-armed Tony and Carmela into the evaluation. I don't remember seeing them sign a consent for the evaluation. The second thing was the lack of a PPT. The only person doing the eval was the school psychologist, but I can personally attest to being the only person doing an eval, this happens when I do outside evals for my district. But this has only happened with re-evaluations. An initial would require a lot more evaluators, including school nurse, social worker (if available) and speech and language.

There was a part of the episode where they showed the evaluation. In the scene, Anthony was completing a projectives exercise. He was looking at pictures and had to describe what he thought about them. My first reaction was, "What test is that?" then I remembered that for test security they wouldn't be able to show an actual test. I thought the school psychologist's demeanor was dead-on. Even his noncommital speech about the "possibility" of having ADD was classic. I think it was interesting how the different Soprano family members kept mistaking the school psychologist for a psychiatrist. He was introduced with the title of doctor, but somehow everyone turned him into a psychiatrist. All in all, it was a decent depiction of what we do.

BBC

NASP Convention - Boston Day 2

My second day at NASP wasn't as successful as my first. I woke up too late to make it to the one mini-skills workshop that I wanted to go to. The problem of lack of handouts continued into the second day. There were a few sessions that I wanted to attend, but I was spent by 3:00. There is only so much you take in after a while. All in all, I enjoyed myself. It's always good to get out of the building and do something for yourself. One thing that was new to me was the forms that I used to document my professional development hours. It was a good way to track what I did. The bonus of attending is that I now have a few more strategies to use and a few more ideas about improving how I do my job.

BBC

Live from the NASP Convention in Boston - Day 1

I'm reporting live from the NASP Convention in Boston. Despite everyone's grumblings about having to travel to New England in February for a convention, the weather hasn't been that bad. It isn't snowing, so that's always a plus.

My initial impression of the convention is that the association has done a poor job of gauging how popular some of the free workshops would be vs. the ones that are real duds. I've either attended or tried to attend 3 very popular free workshops and they have all been standing room only. Meanwhile I attended one session that had a ballroom and it was a 1/4 full. What gives, NASP?

I attended a session run by Cecil Reynolds, professor from Texas A & M, and frequent NASP listserv contributor. He's really nice and personable in person, too bad he comes off as a prick online. That's my assessment so far. More later.

BBC